![taylor swift autograph taylor swift autograph](https://www.gottahaverockandroll.com/ItemImages/000026/nov18-359_lg.jpeg)
- Taylor swift autograph full#
- Taylor swift autograph registration#
- Taylor swift autograph professional#
But she may have a point about the decline of the autograph in general. As Businessweek points out, Swift is regularly spotted signing autographs for fans, and she sells signed merchandise on her website. The only memento ‘kids these days’ want is a selfie.”
![taylor swift autograph taylor swift autograph](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/EbAAAOSw-zxeGHVs/s-l300.jpg)
(She doesn’t say what any of these other “few things” are.) “I haven't been asked for an autograph since the invention of the iPhone with a front-facing camera. “There are a few things I have witnessed becoming obsolete in the past few years, the first being autographs,” she wrote. All of which makes it striking that she has a gloomy outlook on what was once a staple of the music business: the autograph. She’s optimistic about the future of the music industry (it “is not dying … it's just coming alive”), about the relationship between artists and fans (she compares it to a marriage, and says it’s only made more intimate by social media), even about diminishing album sales (they “challenge and motivate” musicians to push themselves).
Taylor swift autograph full#
Swift has as many signatures as outfits.Ĭoming full circle, perhaps this best explains the need for the consistently branded Taylor Swift signature trademark.As you might expect from the author of songs like “Love Story,” “Enchanted,” and “Today was a Fairytale,” the piece Taylor Swift wrote for the Wall Street Journal this week was unashamedly upbeat. If the signatures are authentic, it appears Ms. More to the point of consistency, or the lack thereof, our challenge to handwriting experts is below the jump, showing a collage of photos for sale on eBay, each claiming to be signed by "the" Taylor Swift: Not exactly a model of brand consistency. Linked here are some additional written consents with Taylor Swift’s personal signature as of May 11, 2009, October 5, 2010, and December 15, 2010. Trademark Office, on January 8, 2008, is on the right. Swift’s personal signature, as submitted to the U.S. The highly marketed and consistently branded trademark signature is on the left and Ms. Just don’t be surprised if it looks nothing like the signature appearing on her album/CD covers:
Taylor swift autograph registration#
The consent must be a written consent to the registration of the identifying matter as a mark, and must be personally signed by the individual whose name or likeness appears in the mark. the mark can be registered only with the written consent of the individual. When a name, portrait, or signature in a mark identifies a particular living individual. Swift’s personal written consent to federally register the Taylor Swift name as a trademark, as TMEP 1206.04(a) reads: Now, given all that, as a trademark type, how would you answer the apparently frequent question: "How can I get a Taylor Swift Autograph"?Īs we learned with the recent criticism involving Sarah and Bristol Palin’s attorney (who failed to obtain the necessary written consents at the time of application), perhaps, the best bet might be to scour the USPTO database for Ms.
Taylor swift autograph professional#
If the above signature is not actually penned by Taylor Swift what would that say about her brand, if anything? Would it make her brand any less authentic? Or does a vocal artist get a pass on handwriting, penmanship, and personal signatures, especially at the age of 17, and even thereafter, since it doesn’t affect the authenticity of the voice (remember Milli Vanilli?) (Classic YouTube video here).ĭo you suppose TS fans have an expectation that the Taylor Swift signature trademark represents her actual, personal signature? If so, would their decision to purchase goods be affected if the signature was actually penned by another? Probably not, but if so, would that subject the trademark registration to cancellation on deceptiveness grounds? Or, on the other hand, do fans assume and expect the trademark signature to be part of the artist’s professional handling, more like they would view assistance from a make-up artist, hair stylist, and/or airbrushing expert? Or, could it be that the highly marketed and consistent trademark signature is more about the branding and packaging of the artist and not actually her own handwriting or penmanship? What are the odds that the signature on the cover of Taylor Swift’s self-titled debut album from 2006 depicts her actual and personal signature (she would have been 17 at the time)?